FoodConfusion persists with food traceability rule as compliance date...

Confusion persists with food traceability rule as compliance date nears

-

spot_img


This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

In a little over a year, grocers and their suppliers will need to comply with the Food and Drug Administration’s new food traceability requirements. But several major questions remain, according to a new report.

Grocery industry trade associations have said the rule, which has a compliance date of Jan. 20, 2026, presents the biggest food safety changes that retailers have seen in over a decade. A new report from the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA explores which parts of the rule are confusing to executives that are working to bring their companies into alignment with the rule. 

The report is based on three industry roundtables the foundation held this spring with more than two dozen participants, including executives from General Mills, FMI — The Food Industry Association, Subway, the International Fresh Produce Association and United Natural Foods, Inc. 

Here are the main compliance challenges participants said they face, according to the report. The Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA plans to explore these top issues during a virtual public meeting on the rule on Oct. 7.

Level of labeling for Traceability Lot Codes (TLC)

Firms shipping foods covered by the rule will need to provide TLCs to recipients for each lot of food as well as information on where the food got the code. Participants said they need clarification on the degree of labeling and tracing activity required, and they want better definitions of what information TLCs need to have, according to the report.

“For example, some participants believe that labeling and tracking at the case-level is essential to generate the required information, although case-level labeling and tracking is not explicitly required,” the report noted.

Warehouse management systems

Warehouse management systems vary significantly across the industry and “most are likely not capable of capturing all [required data points] without significant upgrades or overall system replacement,” the report noted.

Given the labor intensity of labeling and scanning every case of food and the fact that a pallet can have mixed lots of the same product, participants wondered if “most likely” lot codes or probability calculations would be acceptable.

Reporting metrics

Participants said they are confused about when they need to submit a completed spreadsheet template to provide information requested by the FDA.

“Participants suggested making the instructional portion of the spreadsheet template more accessible and providing a sample ‘completed template’ to demonstrate expectations for each sector of the supply chain,” the report said. 

The report continued: “Participants also requested the spreadsheet be tested with real-world or simulated data, through the supply chain from farm to restaurant or retailer, to identify any adjustments that might improve its adoption and usability.” 

FDA investigation process

If food-borne illness outbreaks happen, participants said they have questions about the FDA investigation, such as what happens when multiple lot codes are submitted. They also raised concerns about what to do about “damaged, unreadable, improperly encoded, or lost labels,” which could lead to unreliable reporting.

Next steps

Since the rule’s release in November 2022, industry pilot programs have aimed to test current systems and identify changes, but “most” have focused on only one food product or category, the report said.

Along with urging for more pilots, participants said they would like templates for running pilots, spaces to share learnings and tailored tests for small, medium and large businesses.

Additionally, participants said they like to explore public-private partnerships where cross-sector companies work with state regulators and public health agencies. Such partnerships could help support implementation; create consistency around data structure, requirements, timing and standards; provide a space for pilot results; and collect information to share with the FDA.

The FDA said it is willing to participate in a public-private partnership, the report noted. 

While it’s unclear how feasible this proposal is, some participants stated support for staggering the rule’s compliance date by sector or by company size, the report said. 



Source link

Latest news

InnoProtein launches ProteinPioneers for sustainable alternatives

Ahead of World Algae Day (12th...

US election briefing: Trump escalates anti-immigrant rhetoric as Harris promises bipartisan council | US elections 2024

Donald Trump doubled down on his anti-immigrant and xenophobic messaging at a rally in Colorado, calling for the...

Mark Gong Shanghai Spring 2025 Collection

The Shanghai collections kicked off this week but a visa snafu has left this reviewer grounded in New...

Boeing to cut 17,000 jobs and delay 777X jet as revenues fall short

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly...
spot_img

Trump speaks in Denver suburb after vilifying migrant community – US elections live | US elections 2024

Trump repeats anti-migrant claim officials say is exaggeratedTrump is now repeating his claim, which local officials say is...

19 Black-Owned and -Founded Skin-Care Brands You Should Have on Your Radar

The skin-care industry hasn’t always been inclusive of melanated skin—just look at the lack of diversity in clinical...

Must read

spot_img

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you